GEO Scorecard
Four dimensions of AI search visibility, scored 0–100.
Entity Presence
% of prompts mentioned
Sentiment
Avg favourability
Rank Strength
Position quality
Share of Voice
11.2% of mentions
Analyzed 79 provider responses (64 organic) across 4 AI providers.
Entity presence: mentioned in 39% of organic prompts; average strength when mentioned = 55/100.
Branded AEO recognition: 71/100 from Google AI Overview responses to direct brand questions (capped at 20% of entity presence; never counts as organic discovery).
Sentiment: average brand favorability = 85/100 across 25 organic mentions (80–100 = strong endorsement, 50–69 = neutral, below 40 = caveats or criticism).
Visibility Score
16.9%
Weighted across providers
Share of Voice
11.2%
vs competitors
Avg Position
#3.0
When mentioned
Sentiment
98/100
Brand favourability
Visibility by AI Provider
How consistently SNITCH is recommended across each major AI platform.
Competitor Visibility Matrix
Overall AI visibility score across all providers and prompts. SNITCH highlighted in orange.
| Brand | Visibility | Mentions | Avg Position | Share of Voice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H&M | 59.9% | 49 | #2.4 | 31.3% |
| Zara | 55.8% | 45 | #2.7 | 29.2% |
| Myntra | 26.4% | 30 | #3.4 | 13.8% |
| SNITCH (you) | 21.5% | 25 | #3.0 | 11.2% |
| Ajio | 14.3% | 17 | #4.7 | 7.5% |
| Roadster | 5.5% | 8 | #3.5 | 2.9% |
| Flipkart | 2.9% | 3 | #4.0 | 1.5% |
| Rare Rabbit | 2.0% | 2 | #5.5 | 1.0% |
| The Indian Garage Co. | 1.6% | 2 | #5.0 | 0.8% |
| Bear House | 1.4% | 1 | #2.0 | 0.7% |
| Zalora | 0.0% | 0 | — | 0.0% |
GEO Dimension Radar
Visualising strength across all four GEO dimensions.
Performance by Query Type
How often SNITCH is mentioned and at what position, across different types of AI queries.
| Query Type | Share of Answers | Brand Strength | Avg Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust & reputationReputation, reliability and review-consensus queries | 31% | 19% | #3.7 |
| RecommendationsBuying-advice queries — "what should a first-time buyer choose" | 25% | 16% | #4.0 |
| Regional / localLocal-market leadership queries in your geography | 19% | 18% | #— |
| Pricing & valueValue-for-money and premium-vs-budget queries | 13% | 30% | #3.0 |
| Head-to-head comparisonHead-to-head comparisons naming you and competitors directly | 6% | 48% | #4.0 |
| Buyer segments"Best for <buyer type>" queries for your target segment | 6% | 26% | #— |
Based on organic AI answers only: brand-anchored and head-to-head prompts are excluded from these metrics because naming the brand in the question pre-seeds the response. Share of Answers shows how much of the tested question mix each query type covers.
What AI Models Say About SNITCH
Actual phrases used by AI providers when describing SNITCH in their responses.
"relatively new player in the men's fast fashion market"
"popular Indian fast-fashion brand specializing in men’s apparel"
"popular, trendy choice for men's fast fashion in India"
"Fastest-growing and prominent player in Indian men’s fast-fashion segment"
Citation Quality by Provider
Citation quality measures whether AI responses include verifiable sources, structured lists, and authoritative references. Higher = more credible mentions.
What This Means for SNITCH
A GEO Score of 64 places SNITCH in strong territory for AI search, but the 38% peak visibility on Gemini vs 5% on ChatGPT represents a meaningful gap as AI search continues to fragment across providers.
With AI-referred queries converting at higher rates than organic search, and with Google AI Overview now appearing above organic results for commercial queries, each point of visibility directly maps to brand consideration, website traffic, and ultimately revenue.
Learn more
New to AI search visibility?
Start with our guide on what GEO scores measure and why they matter more than traditional SEO rankings in 2026.